|
|
Self-defense for gateways
Connected: An Internet Encyclopedia
Self-defense for gateways
Up:
Connected: An Internet Encyclopedia
Up:
Requests For Comments
Up:
RFC 896
Prev: What to do when an ICMP Source Quench is received
Next: Conclusion
Self-defense for gateways
Self-defense for gateways
As we have shown, gateways are vulnerable to host mismanagement
of congestion. Host misbehavior by excessive traffic generation
can prevent not only the host's own traffic from getting through,
but can interfere with other unrelated traffic. The problem can
be dealt with at the host level but since one malfunctioning host
can interfere with others, future gateways should be capable of
defending themselves against such behavior by obnoxious or malicious hosts. We offer some basic self-defense techniques.
On one occasion in late 1983, a TCP bug in an ARPANET host caused
the host to frantically generate retransmissions of the same
datagram as fast as the ARPANET would accept them. The gateway
that connected our net with the ARPANET was saturated and little
useful traffic could get through, since the gateway had more
bandwidth to the ARPANET than to our net. The gateway busily
sent ICMP Source Quench messages but the malfunctioning host
ignored them. This continued for several hours, until the malfunctioning host crashed. During this period, our network was
effectively disconnected from the ARPANET.
When a gateway is forced to discard a packet, the packet is
selected at the discretion of the gateway. Classic techniques
for making this decision are to discard the most recently
received packet, or the packet at the end of the longest outgoing
queue. We suggest that a worthwhile practical measure is to discard the latest packet from the host that originated the most
packets currently queued within the gateway. This strategy will
tend to balance throughput amongst the hosts using the gateway.
We have not yet tried this strategy, but it seems a reasonable
starting point for gateway self-protection.
Another strategy is to discard a newly arrived packet if the
packet duplicates a packet already in the queue. The computational load for this check is not a problem if hashing techniques
are used. This check will not protect against malicious hosts
but will provide some protection against TCP implementations with
poor retransmission control. Gateways between fast local networks and slower long-haul networks may find this check valuable
if the local hosts are tuned to work well with the local network.
Ideally the gateway should detect malfunctioning hosts and
squelch them; such detection is difficult in a pure datagram system. Failure to respond to an ICMP Source Quench message,
though, should be regarded as grounds for action by a gateway to
disconnect a host. Detecting such failure is non-trivial but is
a worthwhile area for further research.
Next: Conclusion
Connected: An Internet Encyclopedia
Self-defense for gateways
|
|
|
 |

|
 |
|
Protect yourself from cyberstalkers, identity thieves, and those who would snoop on you.
| |
Stop spam from invading your inbox without losing the mail you want. We give you more control over your e-mail than any other service.
| |
Block popups, ads, and malicious scripts while you surf the net through our anonymous proxies.
| |
Participate in Usenet, host your web files, easily send anonymous messages, and more, much more.
| |
All private, all encrypted, all secure, all in an easy to use service, and all for only $5.95 a month!
|
|
Service Details
|
|
 |
|