E.3.4 The Integrated IS-IS Algorithm
Connected: An Internet Encyclopedia
E.3.4 The Integrated IS-IS Algorithm
Up:
Connected: An Internet Encyclopedia
Up:
Requests For Comments
Up:
RFC 1812
Up:
APPENDIX E Additional Next-Hop Selection Algorithms
Up:
E.3 Some Route Lookup Algorithms
Prev: E.3.3 The OSPF Algorithm
Next: Security Considerations
E.3.4 The Integrated IS-IS Algorithm
E.3.4 The Integrated IS-IS Algorithm
Integrated IS-IS uses an algorithm that is similar to but not quite
identical to the OSPF Algorithm. Integrated IS-IS uses a different
set of route classes, and differs slightly in its handling of type of
service. The algorithm is:
- Basic Match
- IS-IS Route Classes
- Longest Match
- Weak TOS
- Best Metric
- Policy
Although Integrated IS-IS uses Weak TOS, the protocol is only capable
of carrying routes for a small specific subset of the possible values
for the TOS field in the IP header. Packets containing other values
in the TOS field are routed using the default TOS.
Type of service support is optional; if disabled, the fourth step
would be omitted. As in OSPF, the specification does not include the
Policy step.
This algorithm has some advantages over the Revised Classic
Algorithm:
- It supports type of service routing.
- Its rules are written down, rather than merely being a part of
the Internet folklore.
- It (obviously) works with Integrated IS-IS.
However, this algorithm also retains some of the disadvantages of the
Revised Classic Algorithm:
- Path properties other than type of service (e.g., MTU) are
ignored.
- As in the Revised Classic Algorithm, the details (or even the
existence) of the Policy step are left to the discretion of the
implementor.
- It doesn't work with OSPF because of the differences between IS-
IS route classes and OSPF route classes. Also, because IS-IS
supports only a subset of the possible TOS values, some obvious
implementations of the Integrated IS-IS algorithm would not
support OSPF's interpretation of TOS.
The Integrated IS-IS Algorithm also has a further disadvantage (which
is not shared by the Revised Classic Algorithm): IS-IS internal
(intra-area or inter-area) routes are always considered to be
superior to routes learned from other routing protocols, even in
cases where the IS-IS route matches fewer bits of the destination
address and doesn't provide the requested type of service. This is a
policy decision that may not be appropriate in all cases.
Finally, it is worth noting that the Integrated IS-IS Algorithm's TOS
support suffers from the same deficiency noted for the OSPF
Algorithm.
Next: Security Considerations
Connected: An Internet Encyclopedia
E.3.4 The Integrated IS-IS Algorithm
|