|
|
2.2 Distributed allocation of address space
Connected: An Internet Encyclopedia
2.2 Distributed allocation of address space
Up:
Connected: An Internet Encyclopedia
Up:
Requests For Comments
Up:
RFC 1519
Up:
2. CIDR address allocation
Prev: 2.1 Aggregation and its limitations
Next: 3. Cost-benefit analysis
2.2 Distributed allocation of address space
2.2 Distributed allocation of address space
The basic idea of the plan is to allocate one or more blocks of Class
C network numbers to each network service provider. Organizations
using the network service provider for Internet connectivity are
allocated bitmask-oriented subsets of the provider's address space as
required.
It is also worthwhile to mention that once inter-domain protocols
which support classless network destinations are widely deployed, the
rules described by this plan generalize to permit arbitrary
super/subnetting of the remaining class A and class B address space
(the assumption being that classless inter-domain protocols will
either allow for non-contiguous subnets to exist in the system or
that all components of a sub-allocated class A/B will be contained
within a single routing domain). This will allow this plan to
continue to be used in the event that the class C space is exhausted
before implementation of a long-term solution is deployed. This
alternative is discussed further below in section 6.
Hierarchical sub-allocation of addresses in this manner implies that
clients with addresses allocated out of a given service provider are,
for routing purposes, part of that service provider and will be
routed via its infrastructure. This implies that routing information
about multi-homed organizations, i.e., organizations connected to
more than one network service provider, will still need to be known
by higher levels in the hierarchy.
The advantages of hierarchical assignment in this fashion are
- It is expected to be easier for a relatively small number of
service providers to obtain addresses from the central
authority, rather than a much larger, and monotonically
increasing, number of individual clients. This is not to be
considered as a loss of part of the service providers' address
space.
- Given the current growth of the Internet, a scalable and
delegatable method of future allocation of network numbers has
to be achieved.
For these reasons, and in the interest of providing a consistent
procedure for obtaining Internet addresses, it is recommended that
most, if not all, network numbers be distributed through service
providers. These issues are discussed in much greater length in [2].
Next: 3. Cost-benefit analysis
Connected: An Internet Encyclopedia
2.2 Distributed allocation of address space
|
|
|
 |

|
 |
|
Protect yourself from cyberstalkers, identity thieves, and those who would snoop on you.
| |
Stop spam from invading your inbox without losing the mail you want. We give you more control over your e-mail than any other service.
| |
Block popups, ads, and malicious scripts while you surf the net through our anonymous proxies.
| |
Participate in Usenet, host your web files, easily send anonymous messages, and more, much more.
| |
All private, all encrypted, all secure, all in an easy to use service, and all for only $5.95 a month!
|
|
Service Details
|
|
 |
|