The Complaint Game
A quiet threat exists to your on-line presence, the
complaint game. You probably understand
that you rely on your ISP to connect, but do you know that you also rely on
them to protect you from harassers? Is
your ISP up to that task? The complaint
game is a term I coined to a new method of harassment and pursuit in on-line
confrontations.
The complaint game is played like this: A user who doesn’t like something you said
on-line begins goading you, attempting to make you angry. While they are doing this they are sending
complaints to your ISP about you. The
target from the beginning is to get your access terminated. Complaints range from the completely fraudulent
(user pastes your headers on other text, hope your ISP checks this), to the
cunning and calculating, to the outright threats. Complaints come from many different accounts, all owned by the
person playing the game. Many people
complaining are viewed as a stronger force.
The user who has targeted you understands the terms of
service of their ISP to the letter, and they get as close to the edge of them
as they can, never crossing the line.
The user, if really well versed at this game, has probably also studied
the terms of service of your ISP. Have
you? Now their goal is to get you to
cross them. They’ll do this by
aggravating you to a level where you post something that they think they can
interpret to violate those terms. This
is the first part of this game.
The second part of the game is played out between that user
and your ISP. It often plays out in
secret. Remember that this user wants
your access terminated at any cost. If
they succeed, it could be an issue if you live in a limited access area. Most people playing this game are as
forceful with the ISP as they are in your on-line confrontation. The most common tact is the use of legal
threats. In an increasingly litigious
world these can be powerful threats.
The battle against on-line anonymity and protection behind
an ISP has had a sad effect in the complaint game. While people struggle to ban on-line anonymity they are
attempting to do it by placing more responsibility upon the ISPs. This weakens the ISP’s position in the
complaint game. Responsibility means
legal responsibility.
As more rulings chip away at an ISP’s common carrier status,
ISP’s get more skittish. They become
more susceptible to being bullied into terminating an account on lesser
offenses. It’s often preferred to
terminate one $30/mo account than risk a potential high cost lawsuit. What this means to you, is that if you
express any opinion that risks bothering anyone, you might be cut off from the
Internet.
The user playing the game knows this. They use it. It’s the biggest weapon they have. Remember that a harasser is focused on one thing, causing you
grief. While you are angry because you
view him as harassing you, he’s playing the system. The bills and laws you may have actually supported, he is using
against you. Getting your access cut
off is a nice trophy in a harasser’s case.
Be aware that this game is played. Make sure your ISP has a backbone. Make sure you understand your ISP’s terms of service, study
them. Shield yourself through free
accounts and shield your ISP when participating in an on-line debate or
discussion. But most importantly
understand that while you are debating, or thinking you are fighting a
harasser, they might be playing the complaint game.
/steve
11/01/2000